Success Stories

State vs AG

Very difficult DWI 2nd case and a weapon case from the same day. We were hired after the previous attorney refused to try the case because he said it was too difficult. While it was a difficult case we fought with the prosecutor over the admissibility of their evidence and, after many hearings, convinced the state to DISMISS BOTH CHARGES.

State vs AR

Client was charged with stealing a car. Unfortunately client was caught red handed. We were able to get the client DEFERRED PROBATION ON A FELONY

State vs RP

Case were client had a car accident and left the scene. We were able to work with client's insurance company and the prosecutor to get him a REDUCTION and UNSUPERVISED DEFERRED.

State vs RCP

Client was a commercial truck driver charged with driving an overweight vehicle. The prosecution originally wanted over $3000 in fees. After an attack on the maintenance of the scale used to measure the truck we were able to force the state to DISMISS the case.

State vs CBL

Client hired us more than halfway through the case and after significant rulings against them. The original offer was to do 8 years in prison. Through diligent attacks on the scientific processes the state was using, we were able to change the plea bargain to two years probation. Because client had already been to prison before this was an excellent result on a difficult case. FELONY PROBATION GRANTED

State vs JG

 Client had gone through six years of a ten year probation without violating and his probation officer decided to file a motion to revoke his probation based on one positive drug test. We fought the allegations of the probation officer and managed to get client's PROBATION TERMINATED even though he had four more years of probation to do. Client went home with no additional cost or time to serve in jail.

State vs JP

This was a DWI 2nd with a high blood test. We were able to get the blood test excluded from evidence, which made it a pretty good case for the defense. We were prepared to go to trial and explained the risks to the client. He decided he would rather take a deal that saw him serve NO PROBATION for the offense as it was reduced to a DWI 1st.